Before making a single edit, Tropedia EXPECTS our site policy and manual of style to be followed.Turks and Spanish do pierce damage and are considered archers and cavalry archers, respectively, so Goths will wreck them in the open. Persians and Huns are very good against archers.Īny infantry is considered a counter to Persians, especially Franks, but it's still pretty hard to kill off an elephant invasion! Franks and (of course) Saracens are good at defending against elephants.įranks are a pretty good counter to the Koreans if managed decently. Teutons beat any infantry or nonranged cavalry except Aztecs and Byzantines, but they're not terrible against Aztecs or Byzantines either.Ĭelts are pretty good against archers and won't really counter anything else. Turks are the best against Byzantines, not Saracens as many believe. However, Saracens will win if they are micromanaging well in a small area.Īnything ranged in general will beat Byzantines if managed decently. Saracens are not good against Byzantines. I'm assuming you mean at the start, answering your two questions:īyzantines beat Teutons in battle and are faster, but the Teutons still stand a chance against them.Ī few others that might not be obvious, again referring to the start of a CBA game: If you have any other questions feel free to add them. The most powerful civilization would be Huns. Though, I must say, if you are playing CBA with the CBA mindset. But remember that just because you have a hard time doesn't mean you can't support an ally attacking or defending against said counters. So, there is just a few off the top of my head. Goths have a hard time against Teutons, Aztecs, Saracens. I'm not sure the exact stats, but Byzantine's only real threat is Teutons.
Teutons have a hard time against any faster ranged unit. Spanish have a hard time against Saracens. Saracens have a hard time against Mayans and Teutons. Meaning, sometimes the rules change such as if you are mongols-you can support, say, Celts attacking/defendings vs Goths.
Remember, I list below as 1v1 and average players. So basically below is an average rule set of what not to attack. OP, if we are strictly talking pre-villager early game and average players and also restricting the situation to units vs units, then some of the all-around stronger civs are, in no particular order: saracens, teutons, mongols, spanish, mayans, byzantines. you play agressive and know how to Flush and Drush, which you probaly don't since you are asking. Tooties should beat a spain with siege ornagers but if played well he can outmaneuver the Tootie with cheap huss spam.Įarly game the picture is quite different, and depending on map.Īztec, Hun, Mayan, Goth are competetive IF!!!!. Turks beats all but Korean and Britt and well played Mongol. Mongol beats all but Mayan, Goth and a well played Saracen. Originally posted by ExTiNcT_SaNitY:Late game.
0 kommentar(er)
